data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eeb6/5eeb651e3e5dabc20541e63e35c889ecf98ea781" alt="Subsonic rounds dead by light"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e64b2/e64b289ee35f6d2fdf302bc142755492af803160" alt="subsonic rounds dead by light subsonic rounds dead by light"
I posted them up so you can see what things you can sharpen up in regards to your search. Overall I really like that design.Īnyway those are my criteria not yours. Lately I've come to appreciate the tubeless suppressors. If you reload you can tailor make what you want. Cheap ammo or powders not optimized for your barrel length plays a huge factor in the big picture. I've had my bell rung by 'subsonic' ammo before. They might show up as slightly louder at the muzzle but overall they are much better.įor 300BLK sound will be determined a lot based on the ammo choice. Several manufacturers now try to balance the gas flow for semi auto use. That means some cans can choke off the muzzle and produce great numbers there, but on a semi auto that means more noise at the port. Size and weight definitely matter but so do things like what I call "gas flow" (my own terminology). Things like a 51T mount for me is an absolute no. I tend to avoid things with moving internal parts. Yes you should take it into account but in my opinion it's not the first item on the list. 02 cents is to not worry so much about advertised DB numbers. Half Neslon is the oldest of this group? On a few tests I came across it tested a bit lower than the Nomad 300 sub and quite a bit lower using 308 supers (Trash Panda version). But I don't really do mag dumps, so probably wouldn't be any issue. However, it's not designed for extended rapid fire. Nomad Ti is super light, quiet, with low back pressure. These babies are finally showing up at dealers, someone please test them! I've contacted Sig many times asking how the SLH compares with the older SRD shooting 300 subs. SLH762 looks promising, as the old SRD762 was the top rated can by Pew for 300 subsonic. Also, I can't find any sound testing TBAC has done with 300 subs, only 308 supers. Does the Dominus flow through much better that than the Ultra 7 or 9? Rated as having very high back pressure level by Pew. High pressure appears better at controlling first round pop, but not so good for keeping gas out of your face on semi-autos. Only concern is TBAC has a history with bolt action rifles, where high back pressure doesn't really matter. I can't find any subsonic testing on the Dominus CB, or testing of any kind on the new Sig SLH cans.Ĭan anyone that owns any of these or has tested any side by side give me some feedback?ĭominus CB seems like the perfect can for me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/869e5/869e50dedde810ec8bf402035f6d6dbdc171d631" alt="subsonic rounds dead by light subsonic rounds dead by light"
I've eliminated the Nomad 30, as testing showed the Ti version slightly better at subsonic levels and 4 oz lighter. As well as company rep, apparent quality, and engineering. I've narrowed it down to the few below, based on any quality sound tests I could track down. I prefer short and light to keep weapon size compact. I'm ready to buy a can just for use on a 300 Blk subsonic, 8" barrel, occasional supers. Hi! New to this forum, but it looked like the right place to get some feedback on suppressors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eeb6/5eeb651e3e5dabc20541e63e35c889ecf98ea781" alt="Subsonic rounds dead by light"